It worked because of the broad variety of head conformations being presented to the immune system and the relative consistency of the stalks. The experimental vaccine also produced more antibodies to the stalk portion of the haemagglutinin.
“The opportunity for the immune system to see that (head portion) over and over and over, like it needs to, is compromised because there’s diversity there,” said Heaton, who is also an associate professor of molecular genetics and microbiology at Duke School of Medicine.
The stalk portion, however, provided the immune system with a more consistent target.
“Antibodies against the stalk work differently,” said Heaton. “Their mechanism of protection is not necessarily to block the first step of infection. So then our idea was, ‘What if we can come up with a vaccine that gives us both? What if we can get good head antibodies and at the same time also get stalk antibodies in case the vaccine selection was wrong, or if there’s a pandemic?’”
“Essentially, the paper says, ‘Yes, we can accomplish that’,” said Heaton, who developed the methods to create large antigen libraries for the study with Luo.
Their approach worked well in preclinical experiments. After a shot of the experimental vaccine was administered, 100 per cent of the animals avoided illness or death from what should have been a lethal dose of flu viruses.
The methods developed by Heaton and Luo to create large antigen libraries have been patented and the next steps of the research will attempt to understand whether the same level of immunity can be achieved by presenting fewer than 80,000 haemagglutinin variants.