A randomised trial conducted by health economists at Duke-NUS Medical School found that a bit of peer influence can nudge us to select healthier groceries.
SINGAPORE, 30 July 2024 — Amid the rise of chronic diseases, such as heart disease and diabetes, a novel study by Duke-NUS Medical School offers a fresh perspective on encouraging healthier grocery shopping. Despite the widespread use of colour-coded front-of-pack nutrition labels aimed to help consumers make healthier choices, these measures have not been sufficient to stem the rising tide of chronic diseases.
To determine if adding behavioural nudges and financial incentives could improve diet quality, researchers from Duke-NUS’ Health Services and Systems Research Programme conducted a randomised trial using an experimental online grocery store called NUSMart.
During the study, participants were asked to complete three online shops and spend roughly S$60. Each time they visited the online store, they randomly encountered one of three versions of NUSMart:
- A control store where packaged food was displayed without any front-of-pack nutritional label;
- A version where consumers could view the nutritional value of each product via a color-coded front-of-pack label. They also saw a colour-coded barometer that compared the quality of their shopping basket to that of their peers (peer influence); and
- A version with the front-of-pack label, peer influence and the option to earn a S$5 cash incentive so long their shopping basket was healthier than their peers’ at checkout.
Summing up the findings, which were published in the journal Food Policy in May, first author and Assistant Professor Soye Shin, from Duke-NUS Health Services and Systems Research Programme, said:
“We found that when our shoppers were exposed to the front-of-pack labels and peer influence, there was a large improvement in the healthiness of the shopping basket. There was an additional improvement in the “yours-to-lose” cash reward arm, but the biggest bang came from the peer influence.”