Singapore’s newly announced Communicable Diseases Agency (CDA) may have had some people scratching their heads in puzzlement. What about the existing National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID) and all the other public health facilities that can be mobilised?
The new government agency under the Ministry of Health (MOH) was unveiled recently during the parliamentary debate on the Covid-19 White Paper, in which Health Minister Ong Ye Kung announced a host of post-pandemic organisational changes to Singapore’s healthcare system.
The CDA will house overall efforts in disease preparedness, prevention and control, surveillance, risk assessment and response. It will amalgamate public health functions of the MOH, NCID and the Health Promotion Board, and will also house the National Public Health Laboratory and maintain oversight of the NCID clinical facilities.
There may be some confusion over the formation of such an agency but this under-one-roof approach is just the spearhead against pandemics at home and abroad that Singapore needs.
Beyond strong clinical facilities
Built in 2019, the NCID was a state-of-the-art facility and was a direct response to the 2003 Sars outbreak. It was a technological marvel, built to treat high-risk pathogens like Ebola and Marburg viruses in its high-level isolation units.
Sars-CoV-2 was a different beast altogether, spreading like wildfire across the world due to high levels of person-to-person transmission. Though our healthcare facilities were stretched, they were ultimately able to cope due to effective public health interventions.
This highlighted the need for public health strategies to extend beyond strong clinical facilities towards more system-wide responses to emerging threats, and this is also where the CDA comes in.
An agency like the CDA can serve the country as a source of public health expertise, provide expert advice and implementation of public health programmes, conduct cutting-edge research, devise disease surveillance strategies and facilitate outreach for health promotion and education. This typically includes immunisation programmes, tracking population health data and statistics to inform public health decisions and training a public health workforce for the future.
In the longer term, these public health activities under the CDA can inform health policy development and implementation. Most of these similar public health agencies or institutions are supported by a national budget, which ensures both stability and sustainability.
Together with a thriving biotechnology sector, a dedicated public health agency can assemble a critical mass of expertise and experience under one roof to ensure that the implementation of outbreak response and preparedness will be rapid and seamless.
A regional impact
While Singapore is an island, it is located in the very heart of South-east Asia – an area at the highest risk for infectious disease outbreaks, either from a novel or known pathogen. This is due to factors such as urbanisation, agriculture, deforestation, the increasingly narrowing space between the human and animal interface, and wider factors such as climate change.
However, its unique geographical location also presents unique opportunities. The Singapore CDA will be well positioned to be more involved in regional public health initiatives and programmes.
In other parts of the world, many public health agencies have collaborative relationships with one another as well as with multilateral organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) or Asean, non-governmental organisations and academic partners. These partnerships can help deepen the capabilities of the CDA by sharing resources, expertise, and cross-country capacity building.
Agencies like the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC) or the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) have similar broad functions. They fall in line with the revised International Health Regulations (IHR 2005), a legally binding agreement for WHO member states to build and strengthen national alert and response systems.
The IHR (2005) expands its scope of internationally reportable diseases and events, provides criteria for identifying novel epidemic events and outlines the conditions of global community involvement in outbreak responses.